infotale

Chapter 19 - The civil claim

My personal-injury attorney, Rachel Kim, evaluated a civil claim against Judith.

Damages:

Medical bills.

Lost wages.

Pain.

Therapy.

Potential future complications? None significant expected.

Could sue homeowner liability insurer.

But intentional-act exclusions complicate coverage.

Judith had umbrella coverage.

Insurer reserved rights.

We filed a limited claim.

No lawsuit at first.

Judith’s carrier covered some negligence-based exposure while disputing intentional assault coverage.

Mediation.

Settlement:

$72,000 gross.

Part insurer-funded under reservation/compromise.

Judith personally contributed $12,000.

No admission beyond criminal conviction already existing.

After fees/medical liens:

Far less to me.

No windfall.

Then I asked Rachel:

“Why settle?”

“Because coverage litigation could take years.”

I did not want years.

I wanted closure within the actual conflict timeline.

We settled.

May you like

No NDA preventing discussion with police/court.

Good.

Other posts